Home of ChanRobles Virtual Law Library

PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

FIRST DIVISION

[G.R. No. L-3860. February 5, 1908. ]

THE UNITED STATES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FAUSTINO TREMOYA, Defendant-Appellant.

Antonio V. Herrero and Enrique N. Barretto, for Appellant.

Attorney-General Araneta, for Appellee.

SYLLABUS


1. COERCION. — A claimant to a parcel of land held adversely who by means of intimidation with a drawn revolver drives off the employees of the other claimant, compelling them to surrender the collected crop, is guilty of coaccion.


D E C I S I O N


TRACEY, J.:


In the Court of First Instance of Ambos Camarines the appellant was convicted of coaccion and sentenced to two months and one day of arresto mayor and a fine of 325 pesetas and the accessories, together with the restitution of the hemp taken by him and the costs of the action.

Faustino Tremoya and Gregorio Tremoya, brothers, on the one side and Santiago Puñado on the other were adverse claimants to a parcel of hemp land which, in company with four workmen, the accused visited and, finding Prudencio and Aniceto Rodriguez cutting hemp there, ordered them to desist. Thereupon there arose a dispute, during which Prudencio Rodriguez showed a bolo and the accused drew his revolver and pointed it at him, threatening that if he did not get out he would fire upon him and his companions. They took themselves off and left Tremoya and his party in possession of the hemp.

The two Rodriguez were employed by Puñado and this fact, and the claim of their owner, must have been known to the accused, for the reason that some time before they had been arrested at the instance of his brother for stealing hemp from this lot, but on trial had been acquitted by the justice of the peace on the ground that, being mere employees of Santiago Puñado, they acted by his orders. It is plain that Puñado and his men were in possession of this land under claim of right and that the remedy of the accused was to assert his title, if any, in the courts and not by forcible dispossession. The violence and intimidation which he exercised to drive them off and obtain possession of the hemp against their will constitute the offense of coaccion as defined in article 497 of the Penal Code. We find no error in the judgment of the court below, which is affirmed with costs of this instance. So ordered.

Arellano, C.J., Torres, Mapa, Johnson, Carson, and Willard, JJ., concur.

Top of Page