FIRST DIVISION
G.R. No. 208948, February 24, 2016
JOSE B. LURIZ, Petitioner, v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, Respondents.
D E C I S I O N
PERLAS-BERNABE, J.:
Assailed in this petition for review on certiorari1 are the Decision2 dated May 15, 2013 and the Resolution3 dated August 30, 2013 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. CV No. 95148, which reversed and set aside the Decision4 dated December 15, 2009 of the Regional Trial Court of Quezon City, Branch 83 (RTC) in LRC Case No. Q-8922 (97), thereby dismissing the petition for reconstitution filed by petitioner Jose B. Luriz (Luriz).
[W]hen the proclamation of the independence of the Philippines by President Truman was made, said independence was granted ';in accordance with and subject to the reservations provided in the applicable statutes of the United States," The enforcement of the Trading With the Enemy Act of the United States was contemplated to be made applicable after independence, within the meaning of the reservations.
On the part of the Philippines, conformity to the enactment of the Philippine Property Act of 1946 of the United States was announced by President Manuel Roxas in a joint statement signed by him and by Commissioner McNutt. Ambassador Romulo also formally expressed the conformity of the Philippine Government to the approval of said act to the American Senate prior to its approval. And after the grant of independence, the Congress of the Philippines approved Republic Act No. 8, entitledAN ACT TO AUTHORIZE THE PRESIDENT OF THE PHILIPPINES TO ENTER INTO SUCH CONTRACT OR UNDERTAKINGS AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO EFFECTUATE THE TRANSFER TO THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES UNDER THE PHILIPPINE PROPERTY ACT OF NINETEEN HUNDRED AND FORTY-SIX OF ANY PROPERTY OR PROPERTY RIGHTS OR THE PROCEEDS THEREOF AUTHORIZED TO BE TRANSFERRED UNDER SAID ACT; PROVIDING FOR THE ADMINISTRATION AND DISPOSITION OF SUCH PROPERTIES ONCE RECEIVED; AND APPROPRIATING THE NECESSARY FUND THEREFOR.The Congress of the Philippines also approved Republic Act No. 7, which established a Foreign Funds Control Office. After the approval of the Philippine Property Act of 1946 of the United States, the Philippine Government, also formally expressed, through the Secretary of Foreign Affairs, conformity thereto. (See letters of Secretary dated August 22, 1946, and June 3, 1947.) The Congress of the Philippines has also approved Republic Act No. 477, which provides for the administration and disposition of properties which have been or may hereafter be transferred to the Republic of the Philippines in accordance with the Philippine Property Act of 1946 of the United States.
It is evident, therefore, that the consent of the Philippine Government to the application of the Philippine Property Act of 1946 to the Philippines after independence was given, not only by the Executive Department of the Philippine Government, but also by the Congress, which enacted the laws that would implement or carry out the benefits accruing from the operation of the United States law. x x x.57 (Emphasis supplied)
(a) covered by TCT No. 1297 issued by the RD-QC on July 19, 1941, and may be found in B[oo]k T-9 P[age]47 of the registration book; (b) situated in QC, and bounded and described as follows: "(1) Lot No. 8, Block No. 260, subdivision, Psd-18527, portion of Lot No. 4-B-3-C-2A-1, described in subdivision Plan Psd-18526, GLRO Record No. 7681 NE - Lot No. 10, Block No. 260 ) SE - Lot No. 9, Block No. 260 ) SW - Lot No. 6, Block No. 260 ) AREA: 1578.8 NW - Street Lot No. 31 ) square meters (2) Lot No. 10, Block No. 260, etc. (see above) NE - Lot No. 12, Block No. 260 ) SE - Lot No. 11, Block No. 260 ) SW - Lot No. 8, Block No. 260 ) AREA: 1454.7 NW - Street Lot No. 31 ) square meters"61 (c) registered in accordance with the provisions of the Land Registration Act in the name of: "YOICHIRO URAKAMI, Japanese, married to Hisako Urakami."62 (d) "originally registered on 8th My 1914 in the Register Book of [the RD-QC], Vol. A-7, Page 136, as O.C.T #735, pursuant to Decree #17431, issued in G.L.R.O.____________ , Record #7681."63
Endnotes:
1 Rollo, pp. 14-30.
2 Id. at 57-68. Penned by Associate Justice Agnes Reyes-Carpio with Associate Justices Rosalinda Asuncion-Vicente and Priscilla J. Baltazar-Padilla concurring.
3 Id. at 70-71.
4 Id. at 33-55. Penned by Presiding Judge Ralph S. Lee.
5 Dated April 25, 1997. Id. at 98-99.
6 Records, Vol. 1, p. 5, including dorsal portion.
7 See rollo, pp. 33-34 and 36.
8 Id. at 117-118 (pages are inadvertently misarranged).
9 Id. at 114-115.
10 See id. at 98.
11 See id. at 33 and 98.
12 Id. at 108. Issued by Executive Judge Estrella T. Estrada.
13 Id.
14 See Certificate of Publication of the National Printing Office issued on August 18, 1997; id. at 112.
15 See Certificate of Posting issued on September 24, 1997; id. at 113.
16 Dated August 17, 1998. Id. at 182-186.
17 Id. at 195-196.
18 Id. at 198-202.
19 Id. at 204.
20 Id. at 223-224.
21 Id. at 222.
22 See id. at 37.
23 Records, Vol. 1, pp. 160-162.
24 Id. at 201-204.cralawred
25 Records, Vol.2, pp. 755-756.
26 See rollo, p. 41.cralawred
27 Report No. 10-2006 dated December 11, 2006; records, Vol. 2, pp. 877-883.
28 Id. at 882.
29 Purportedly by virtue of an Order dated January 20, 1997 issued by the Land Registration Authority in Adm. Reconstitution No. Q-536 (97). See Villanueva's Opposition; records, Vol. 1, pp. 71-74.
30 See rollo, p. 38.
31 Id. at 33-55.
32 Id. at 55.
33 See id. at 47.
34 See id. at 52.
35 See id. at 48-49.
36 See Notice of Appeal dated January 12, 2010; records, Vol. 2, pp. 1098-1100.
37Rollo, pp. 57-68.
38 Id. at 68.
39 See id. at 63-67.cralawred
40 See motion for reconsideration dated June 6, 2013; CA rollo, pp. 295-302.
41Rollo, pp. 70-71.
42 See Republic v. Santua, 586 Phil. 291, 297-298 (2008).
43 Section 3. Transfer certificates of title shall be reconstituted from such of the sources hereunder enumerated as may be available, in the following order:
(a) The owner's duplicate of the certificate of title;
x x x x
44 Entitled "An act Providing A Special Procedure for the Reconstitution of Torrens Certificates of Title Lost or Destroyed," approved on September 25, 1946.
45 Heirs of Enrique Toring v. Heirs of Teodosia Boquilaga, 645 Phil. 518, 534 (2010). See also ' Section 12 of RA 26 which provides:
chanRoblesvirtualLawlibrarySEC. 12. Petitions for reconstitution from sources enumerated in sections 2(c), 2(d), 2(e), 2(f), 3(c), 3(d), 3(e), and/or 3(0 of this Act, shall be filed with the proper Court of First Instance, by the registered owner, his assigns, or any person having an interest in the property. The petition shall state or contain, among other things, the following: (a) that the owners duplicate of the certificate of title had been lost or destroyed; (b) that no co-owner's, mortgagee's or lessee's duplicate had been issued, or, if any had been issued, the same had been lost or destroyed; (c) the location, area and boundaries of the property; (d) the nature and description of the buildings or improvements, if any, which do not belong to the owner of the land, and the names and addresses of the owners of such buildings or improvements; (e) the names and addresses of the occupants or persons in possession of the property, of the owners of the adjoining properties and of all persons who may have interest in the property; (f) a detailed description of the encumbrances, if any, affecting the property; and (g) a statement that no deeds or other instruments affecting the property have been presented for registration, or, if there be any, the registration thereof has not been accomplished, as yet. All the documents, or authenticated copies thereof, to be introduced in evidence in support to the petition for reconstitution shall be attached thereto and filed with the same: Provided, That in case the reconstitution is to be made exclusively from sources enumerated in section 2(f) or 3(f) of this Act, the petition shall be further accompanied with a plan and technical description of the property duly approved by the Chief of the General Land Registration Office, or with a certified copy of the description taken from a prior certificate of title covering the same property.46 Angat v. Republic, 609 Phil. 146, 171 (2009), citing Puzon v. Sta. Lucia Really and Development, Inc., 406 Phil. 263(2001).
47Rollo, pp. 195-196.
48 Enacted on October 6, 1917.
49 Public Law 485 - 79th US Congress, entitled "AN ACT TO PROVIDE FOR THE RETENTION BY THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT OR ITS AGENCIES OR INSTRUMENTALITIES OF REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY WITHIN THE PHILIPPINES NOW OWNED OR LATER ACQUIRED AND FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE TRADING WITH THE ENEMY ACT OF OCTOBER 16.1917 AS AMENDED, IN THE PHILIPPINES, SUBSEQUENT TO INDEPENDENCE," approved on July 3, 1946.
50 Entitled "ESTABLISHING THE PHILIPPINE ALIEN PROPERTY ADMINISTRATION AND DEFYING ITS FUNCTIONS," issued by US President Harry S. Truman on January 7, 1947.
51Rollo, p. 197. Vesting Order No. P-89 and Exhibit A were published in the Official Gazette, Vol. 43, pp. 1390-1391 (April 1947).
52 Id. at 196.
53 See Id.
54 See Haw Pin v. China Banking Corporation, 80 Phil 604, 625 (1948).
55 See Brownell, Jr. v. Sun Life Assurance Company, 95 Phil. 228, 236 (1954).
56 Id.
57 Id. at 232-233.
58 Namely, the Trading with the Enemy Act, as amended, and the Philippine Property Act of 1946. The said laws which were passed by the US Congress continued to be in force even after the Philippines was given independence on July 4, 1946. (See Brownell, Jr. v. Bantista, 95 Phil. 853, 862- 863 [1954], citing Brownell, Jr. v. Sun Life Assurance Company, id.)
59 See Dimaguila v. Monteiro, G.R. No. 201011", January 27, 2014, 714 SCRA 565, 582.
60 See rollo, pp. 195 and 197.
61 Id. at 197.
62 Id.
63 See id.
64 See Republic v. Guanzon, 158 Phil. 1000, 1003 (1974); citations omitted.
65 Lino M. Patajo, Application of the Trading with the Enemy Act in the Philippines, 26 PHILIPPINE LAW JOURNAL 305, 331-333 (1951).
66§39. Retention of properties or interests of Germany and Japan and their nationals; proceeds covered into Treasury; ex gratia payment to Switzerland
(a) No property or interest therein of Germany, Japan, or any national of either such country vested in or transferred to any officer or agency of the Government at any time after December 17, 1941. pursuant to the provisions of this Act, shall be returned to former owners thereof or their successors in interest, and the United States shall not pay compensation for any such property or interest therein. The net proceeds remaining upon the completion of administration, liquidation, and disposition pursuant to the provisions of this Act of any such property or interest therein shall be covered into the Treasury at the earliest practicable date. Nothing in this section shall be construed to repeal or otherwise affect the operation of the provisions of section 32, 40, 41, 42 or 43 of this Act or of the Philippine Property Act of 1946.
x x x x (Underscoring supplied)
67 Lino M. Patajo, Application of the Trading with the Enemy Act in the Philippines, 26 PHILIPPINE LAW JOURNAL 305, 333 (1951), citing 3 Hyde, International Law, p. 1736-1737.
68 Lino M. Patajo, Application of the Trading with the Enemy Act in the Philippines, 26 Philippine Law Journal 305, 334 (1951). Such suits shall be filed pursuant to Section 9 (a) of the said Act, which reads:
chanRoblesvirtualLawlibrary§9. Claims to property transferred to custodian; notice of claim; filing; return of property; suits to recover; sale of claimed property in time of war or during national emergency69 Lino M. Patajo, Application of the Trading with the Enemy Act in the Philippines, 26 Philippine Law Journal 305, 336-337 (1951). See also Section 33 of the same Act which reads:
(a) Any person not an enemy or ally of enemy claiming any interest right, or title in any money or other property which may have been conveyed, transferred, assigned, delivered, or paid to the Alien Property Custodian or seized by him hereunder and held by him or by the Treasurer of the United States, or to whom any debt may be owing from an enemy or ally of enemy whose property or any part thereof shall have been conveyed, transferred, assigned, delivered, or paid to the Alien Property Custodian or seized by him hereunder and held by him or by the Treasurer of the United States may file with the said custodian a notice of his claim under oath and in such form and containing such particulars as the said custodian shall require; and the President, if application is made therefor by the claimant, may order the payment, conveyance, transfer, assignment, or delivery to said claimant of the money or other property so held by the Alien Property Custodian or by the Treasurer of the United States, or of the interest therein to which the President shall determine said claimant is entitled: Provided, That no such order by the President shall bar any person from the prosecution of any suit at law or in equity against the claimant to establish any right, title, or interest which he may have in such money or other property. If the President shall not so order within sixty days after the filing of such application or if the claimant shall have filed the notice as above required and shall have made no application to the President, said claimant may institute a suit in equity in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia or in the district court of the United States for the district in which such claimant resides, or, if a corporation, where it has its principal place of business (to which suit the Alien Property Custodian or the Treasurer of the United States, as the case may be, shall be made a party defendant), to establish the interest, right, title, or debt so claimed, and if so established the court shall order the payment, conveyance, transfer, assignment, or delivery to said claimant of the money or other property so held by the Alien Property Custodian or by the Treasurer of the United States or the interest therein to which the court shall determine said claimant is entitled. If suit shall be so instituted, then such money or property shall be retained in the custody of the Alien Property Custodian, or in the Treasury of the United States, as provided in this Act, and until any final judgment or decree which shall be entered in favor of the claimant shall be fully satisfied by payment or conveyance, transfer, assignment, or delivery by the defendant, or by the Alien Property Custodian, or Treasurer of the United States on order of the court, or until final judgment or decree shall be entered against the claimant or suit otherwise terminated: Provided further, That upon a determination made by the President, in time of war or during any national emergency declared by the President, that the interest and welfare of the United States require the sale of any property or interest or any part thereof claimed in any suit filed under this subsection and pending on or after the date of enactment of this proviso the Alien Property Custodian or any successor officer, or agency may sell such property or interest or part thereof, in conformity with law applicable to sales of property by him, at any time prior to the entry of final judgment in such suit. No such sale shall be made until thirty days have passed after the publication of notice in the Federal Register of the intention to sell. The net proceeds of any such sale shall be deposited in a special account established in the Treasury, and shall be held in trust by the Secretary of the Treasury pending the entry of final judgment in such suit. Any recovery of any claimant in any such suit in respect of the property or interest or part thereof so sold shall be satisfied from the net proceeds of such sale unless such claimant, within sixty days after receipt of notice of the amount of net proceeds of sale serves upon the Alien Property Custodian, or any successor officer or agency, and files with the court an election to waive all claims to the net proceeds, or any part thereof, and to claim just compensation instead. If the court finds that the claimant has established an interest, right, or title in any property in respect of which such an election has been served and filed, it shall proceed to determine the amount which will constitute just compensation for such interest, right, or title, and shall order payment to the claimant of the amount so determined. An order for the payment of just compensation hereunder shall be a judgment against the United States and shall be payable first from the net proceeds of the sale in an amount not to exceed the amount the claimant would have received had he elected to accept his proportionate part of the net proceeds of the sale, and the balance, if any, shall be payable in the same manner as are judgments in cases arising under section 1346 of title 28, United States Code. The Alien Property Custodian or any successor officer or agency shall, immediately upon the entry of final judgment, notify the Secretary of the Treasury of the determination by final judgment of the claimant's interest and right to the proportionate part of the net proceeds from the sale, and the final determination by judgment of the amount of just compensation in the event the claimant has elected to recover just compensation for the interest in the property he claimed,
x x x x (Underscoring supplied)§33. Notice of Claim; institution of suits; computation of time.70 See Reyes v. Pecson, 86 Phil. 181, 189 (1950), wherein the Court elucidated the effect of the vesting of a property, thus:
No return may be made pursuant to section 9 or 32 unless notice of claim has been filed: (a) in the case of any property or interest acquired by the United States prior to December 18, 1941, by August 9, 1948; or (b) in the case of any property or interest acquired by the United States on or after December 18, 1941, not later than one year from February 9, 1954, or two years from the vesting of the property or interest in respect of which the claim is made, whichever is later. No suit pursuant to section 9 may be instituted after April 30, 1949, or after the expiration of two years from the date of the seizure by or vesting in the Alien Property Custodian, as the case may be, of the property or interest in respect of which relief is sought, whichever is later, but in computing such two years there shall be excluded any period during which there was pending a suit or claim for return pursuant to section 9 or 32(a) hereof. (Underscoring supplied)
chanRoblesvirtualLawlibraryThe Philippine Alien Property Administrator was not a debtor of Teizo Mori, because the latter had been divested of any title or interest in the properties formerly owned by him and registered in his name after the vesting order No. P-7 had been executed, and because the said properties after the vesting order No. P-7 had been executed, and after they had been sold, the proceeds realized from the sale thereof, belonged to the Government of the United States of America.71 Under Executive Order 10254. entitled "Terminating the Philippine Alien Property Administration and Transferring Its Functions to the Department of Justice," issued by US President Harry S. Truman on June 15, 1951, the Philippine Alien Property Administration terminated, and all authority, rights, privileges, powers, duties, functions, as well as all property or interests vested in or transferred to such Administration or the Administrator thereof, were vested in or transferred or delegated to the Attorney General, to be administered by him or under his direction and control by such officers and agencies of the Department of Justice as he may designate.
72Rollo, pp. 198-202.
73 Id. at 223-224.
74 Id. at 222.
75Palileo v. National Irrigation Administration, 509 Phil. 273, 282 (2005).
76 See Sps. Layos v. Fil-Estate Golf and Dev't Inc., 583 Phil. 72, 115-116 (2008).